Side-by-side metric guide

Value at Risk vs Maximum Drawdown

VaR is a probabilistic daily loss estimate, while Maximum Drawdown is the worst historical peak-to-trough decline. VaR helps with expected bad-day sizing; drawdown reflects lived pain.

When to use each

VaR 95

Use VaR for day-to-day risk budgeting and understanding typical tail risk at a selected confidence level.

Max DD

Use Maximum Drawdown to evaluate survivability, stress endurance, and recovery burden over full history.

Key differences

Type

Model-based estimate

Historical realized outcome

Time focus

Usually one-day horizon

Full-period peak-to-trough event

What it answers

How bad can a typical extreme day be?

How deep was the worst cumulative decline?

Common pitfalls

  • VaR can understate true tail losses when returns are non-normal.
  • Maximum Drawdown is path-dependent and may worsen with longer history.
  • Using either metric alone hides important context.

Practical decision rule

Use VaR for active sizing and operational risk limits, and Max Drawdown for strategic durability and behavior risk.

Frequently asked questions

Does VaR tell me the worst possible loss?
No. VaR gives a threshold at a confidence level, not the worst-case loss beyond that threshold.
Can I have low VaR but high drawdown?
Yes. A portfolio can look calm daily but still experience a large cumulative decline over a prolonged regime shift.

See these metrics on your own portfolio.

Portivex calculates both metrics side by side so you can make decisions with clearer risk context.

Analyse my portfolio